Saubier.com  



Go Back   Saubier.com > Saubier.com Forums > Small Caliber Discussion Board

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-04-2009, 11:52 PM
Daryl Daryl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Prince George, B.C. Canada
Posts: 4,273
Default ltra velocity .22's for Big Game

It's in the bullet, ya know. This link was sent to me by George. He wanted me to mail it to everyone, but I figured this might serve.

Interesting concept- think I'd just stay with a .22/250 or Swift, if as accurate as my last one. Trouble is, the throat was gone to 1" in 1,000 rounds and I was only pushing it to 4,100fps. I wanted to try some 40gr. HP's at 4,400fps, but couldn't get anywhere near the throat at that time.

This link if either going to upset you, or confirm thoughts that with the right bullet, small calibres might be useable for small, big game.

C:\Users\DarylTS\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\T emporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\PK9YZJ84\22x64.htm
__________________
Daryl
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2009, 12:42 AM
trotterlg trotterlg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,108
Default

That link is to a file on your computer. Larry
__________________
A gun is just like a parachute, if you really need one, nothing else will do.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-05-2009, 04:14 AM
1buba 1buba is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Pole, AK
Posts: 33
Default

PO Ackley did a lot of testing with hi-velocity small bores on big game. I think the big problem now is that we take longer shots than he did, and it's no longer politically correct.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-05-2009, 01:00 PM
sicero sicero is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Medway, Ohio
Posts: 3,013
Default

Something along these lines. I went moose hunting in Newfoundland a few years ago. Out of curiosity I asked my guide what he hunted moose with. He said a 222 in the lungs and no shots over 75yd. He also said he wouldn't take a client with the same weapon. Kenny
__________________
sicero

I pride myself in being able to make decisions with little information.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-05-2009, 03:05 PM
Daryl Daryl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Prince George, B.C. Canada
Posts: 4,273
Default

Sorry- stupid me- bloody infernal machines! But where would we be without them. Gonna try again to bring it up - will edit this if I can get the real address. Second attempt resulted in a comp. file agai OK- here it is - googled it to find the real address. http://www.gsgroup.co.za/22x64.html Do believe I'd still stick with a smaller .22 round- probably not even go there. When I hunt and where I hunt I'm as likely to run into a grizzly as a whitetail buck or moose. Happened once when I was packing my .218Bee with 45gr. Barnes X for a doe. Wierd feeling being armed with a .218Bee Ruger Single shot facing a biting-type bear.
__________________
Daryl

Last edited by Daryl; 01-05-2009 at 03:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-05-2009, 03:11 PM
Daryl Daryl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Prince George, B.C. Canada
Posts: 4,273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sicero View Post
Something along these lines. I went moose hunting in Newfoundland a few years ago. Out of curiosity I asked my guide what he hunted moose with. He said a 222 in the lungs and no shots over 75yd. He also said he wouldn't take a client with the same weapon. Kenny
Kenny- I fully understand the guide's reluctance in guiding a hunter with a .222 for moose. Although the odd hunter who comes up here on a guided hunt can shoot, they are few and far between. As noted above, the .222 is not my choice for hunting around here. My 'hunting' rifles are all .366 cal. or larger.
__________________
Daryl
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-05-2009, 03:55 PM
MarinePMI MarinePMI is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,483
Default

.366? Would that be a 9.3x62?

Good cartridge...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-05-2009, 04:09 PM
iiranger iiranger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 152
Default Amusing...

The .270 is just a .27/'06.
Mr. Ackley made,sold a bullet that was all copper with a tiny piece of lead in the tip to encourage expansion, 75 years ago. Fond in his .228, an '06 case with a belt swaged on, called WORK, and at high velocity. CF .22 Newton?
Mr. A. also commented, in his books, on killing with the .220 Swift using appropriate bullets. Works good. "Appropriate bullets" is the key.
I believe the biggest griz in North America was killed with a .22 short. Young lady, Native American Indian, was grand daughter of tribe's bear killer. He used .22 Long rifle. Shot into mouth/brain. But she was only a girl and they only gave her .22 shorts for her single shot... Made it...
Geo. Herter had a funny story. He was hunting polar bears with Inuit Indians. The young were feuding with the old. The old thought that the right gun for the polar bear was the .22 Hornet. The young thought they were out of date and the "up to date" bear hunter would carry nothing but a .222 Remington. Of course they find bears swimming and pretty helpless and shoot them in the head area... Happy new year...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-05-2009, 05:32 PM
Greyfox1947 Greyfox1947 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 289
Default

I've hunted white tail deer the last 5 seasons with a 5.6x50 Imp. I have used both a 55gr Speer Bearclaw and a 60gr Nosler Partition. Both bullets have performed flawlessly. All shots have been made to either the head or neck, ranges from 30 yards to 250 yards. With one exception, all dropped in their tracks. The exception went about 25 yards downhill, falling most of the way.

It's alwasy seems odd to me that many men will get a 243 for their wife or son and use a larger, say 300 Win Mag, for themselves. If you can't place your shot, you need to practice before you go after big game. If you can shoot, a smaller caliber is more than adequate. I prefer the head & neck shots because the animal does not suffer, they don't run and no meat is destroyed. It works for me.

Rick

Last edited by Greyfox1947; 01-06-2009 at 12:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-05-2009, 10:09 PM
TinMan TinMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,800
Default

I had just the oppose experience from Greyfox1947. Bought a very nice 243 M70 from a neighbor - turns out it was his. Hers was an old BAR in 300WM. A real surprise to me. It really was as GF described, she was the "Macho" excess type and he was the precision shooter.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.